Melissa Frazier

Associate Dean of the College

AB, Harvard University. PhD, University of California–Berkeley. Special interests include the 19th-century novel and literature and the literary marketplace. Author of articles and books on topics including Pushkin, Senkovskii, Gogol, Tolstoy, and Russian Formalism. Awarded the 2007 Jean-Pierre Barricelli Prize for “Best Work in Romanticism Studies,” by the International Conference of Romanticism, for Romantic Encounters: Writers, Readers, and the “Library for Reading” (Stanford University Press, 2007). SLC, 1995–

Undergraduate Courses 2018-2019

Russian

Beginning Russian

Open , Seminar—Year

At the end of this course, students will know the fundamentals of Russian grammar and will be able to use them to read, write, and, above all, speak Russian on an elementary level. Successful language learning involves both creativity and a certain amount of rote learning—memorization gives the student the basis to then extrapolate, improvise, and have fun with the language—and this course will lay equal emphasis on both. Our four hours of class each week will be spent actively using what we know in pair and group activities, dialogues, discussions, etc. Twice-weekly written homework, serving both to reinforce old and to introduce new material, will be required. At the end of each semester, we will formalize the principle of rigorous but creative communication that underlies all of our work through small-group video projects. Students are also required to attend weekly meetings with the Russian assistant; attendance at Russian Table is strongly encouraged.

Faculty
Related Disciplines

Previous Courses

Intermediate Russian

Intermediate , Seminar—Year

Prerequisite: one year of college Russian or the equivalent.

At the end of this course, students should feel that they have a fairly sophisticated grasp of Russian and the ability to communicate in Russian in any situation. After the first year of studying the language, students will have learned the bulk of Russian grammar; this course will emphasize grammar review, vocabulary accumulation, and regular oral practice. Class time will center on the spoken language, and students will be expected to participate actively in discussions based on new vocabulary. Regular written homework will be required, along with weekly conversation classes with the Russian assistant. Attendance at Russian Table is strongly encouraged. Conference work will focus on the written language. Students will be asked to read short texts by the author(s) of their choice, with the aim of appreciating a very different culture and/or literature while learning to read independently, accurately, and with as little recourse to the dictionary as possible.

Faculty
Related Disciplines

The 19th-Century Russian Novel

Open , Seminar—Fall

Henry James called them “baggy monsters.” For the Vicomte de Vogüé, they were not romans but russ-ans. This course will argue that the Russian novel is marked, above all, by its persistent posing of the question of form. We will begin with Bakhtin’s theory of the novel and also with Tolstoy’s essay, “A Few Words About War and Peace,” which claims that War and Peace is not a novel but only the latest in a long line of 19th-century Russian non-novels, including Pushkin’s Eugene Onegin, Gogol’s Dead Souls, and Dostoevsky’s House of the Dead. We will read all these works and more, as we attempt to answer the double question that Tolstoy raises: not just what is the “novel,” but also what we mean by “Russia.”

Faculty
Related Disciplines

Revolution and Utopia in Language: Russian Literature from Dostoevsky to Platonov

Open , Seminar—Fall

In his 1984 essay “Catastrophes in the Air,” the poet Joseph Brodsky suggests that, as its “every sentence drives the Russian language into a semantic dead end or, more precisely, reveals a proclivity for dead ends, a blind-alley mentality in the language itself,” Andrei Platonov’s The Foundation Pit (1930) can be profitably read as a sequel to Dostoevsky’s Demons (1872). This course will frame a reading of Russian literature both before and after the 1917 Revolution with Brodsky’s insight. We will begin not with Demons but with the most important revolutionary and utopian text in Russian literature, Chernyshevsky’s novel-manifesto, What Is To Be Done? (1863). In response to Chernyshevsky, we will turn first to Demons and then to Tolstoy’s Anna Karenina (1877) before considering Andrei Bely’s attempt in Petersburg (1916) to write both an explosion into the 20th century and also a culmination of all that has come before. We will then read from the wild burst of creativity in the 1920s as Russian literature fragmented into smaller forms—Shklovsky’s Sentimental Journey (1923), Zamiatin’s We (1924), Babel’s Red Cavalry (1926), Olesha’s Envy (1927)—before finishing with The Foundation Pit and what Brodsky sees as its essentially Dostoevskiian message: “Language is a millenarian device, history isn't.”

Faculty
Related Disciplines

Additional Information

Selected Syllabi

Selected Publications

Romantic Encounters: Writers, Readers and the “Library for Reading

Romantic Encounters: Writers, Readers and the “Library for Reading

Stanford University Press, 2007

Awarded the 2007 Jean-Pierre Barricelli Prize for “best work in Romanticism studies” by the International Conference of Romanticism.

Frames of the Imagination: Gogol’s Arabesques and the Romantic Question of Genre.

Frames of the Imagination: Gogol’s Arabesques and the Romantic Question of Genre.

Peter Lang Publishing, 2000.

“Преподавание Бахтина американским студентам”

Forthcoming: Диалог. Карнавал. Хронотоп. (2013).

“Balzacorama: Panoramic Vision in Nabokov’s Lolita”

Comparative Literature Studies. 48: 4 (2011) 486-511.

“Personae and Personality in O. I. Senkovskij”

Russian Literature. LVI-IV (2004) 343-362.

“Space and Genre in Gogol’‘s Arabeski”

Slavic and East European Journal, 43: 3 (1999).

“De-familiarizing the Tolstoj of Formalism”

Russian Literature. XLIV (1998) 143-158.

“Arabeski, Architecture and Printing,” in The Subject’s Space: Empire, Nation, and the Culture of Russia’s Golden Age”

eds. Monika Greenleaf and Stephen Moeller-Sally (Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1998) 277-295.

“Kapitanskaja dočka and the Creativity of Borrowing”

Slavic and East European Journal, 37:4 (1993) 472-489.